Russia is preparing for nuclear war with the US and its allies ... Russia Is Preparing for Nuclear War with the US and Its Allies
13/01/2015
We publish the following letter from David K. Lifshultsa (David K. Lifschultz), President of Genoil, Inc., whose headquarters is located on the 11th floor of Rockefeller Center in New York, NY, 10020. David promoting his company for many years ; the company owns patents for economically viable process of converting heavy oil into light.
We think that his warnings seriously and worthy of attention of our readers.
By David K. Lifshultsa, January 11, 2105:
Taking into account the warning Gorbachev about nuclear war over Ukraine, I am sending back an overview of Russian military power.
... Europe is not returned in the 1930s, because she never went out of them. Great powers are maneuvering to Europe, declaring war on each other (President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Franklin Delano Roosevelt), when in 1940 he was asked why he had not imposed an embargo on the supply of oil to Japan, explained that it would be a declaration of war. He announced embargo July 25, 1941. So any suggestion that the EU and the United States is not at war with Russia, not true). The tiny state in the Baltic States and Poland, and some others, screaming hysterically, speaking against Russia, as they were against Germany in 1939, and did not understand what they are - a pawn for the large states that deal with them as soon as they want. They have already forgotten about Germany. Nobody really do not care about the population of Poland or Ukraine or other countries, like Poland realized after the British killed General Wladyslaw Sikorski (Wladyslaw Sikorski) for the partition of Poland at the request of Stalin (Stalin), and after the mass shootings in Katyn.
Perfect peace treaty in this situation would consist of the following: Returns Poland Western Ukraine, which was part of it until the Second World War, the return of East Prussia Germany, which took her Stalin and Russia's return eastern regions of Ukraine, whose population has always been a part of Russia, and the exclusion of Poland from NATO. Such a proposal, if it comes to the population of Russia, Poland and Germany, will be extremely popular, even though the German government to agree to it only when the complete separation of Russia, as in 1914. In addition, the Eastern European NATO member states should adopt neutrality, and all Western defense systems must be dismantled. They are, in any case, it is not necessary, because we have rocket launchers on submarines in the coastal zone of Russia. Can missile systems S-500 to stop them is thought to Russian or not - it does not matter, because the base is covered as well with the sea and the land. It achieved this with the help of the fleet of nuclear submarines of the "Trident" in the days of Ronald Reagan (Ronald Reagan).
Now the difference is that today the Russian military has a strong potential in the world, and that is why they do not express threats such as Germany and the United States, because they hold all the cards. See our "playing Russian roulette with the Russian." There is a large flow of misinformation about laser defense systems in outer space in the spirit of "Star Wars", which are able to bring down Western intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and cruise missiles, but this is pure science fiction. In space there is considerable resistance to laser beams, and although it is not the same as on the ground, they can not shoot down ICBMs, as well as a surface-based missiles. Russia may use financial default as a potential financial weapons of mass destruction for its debt to Western countries and banks for 600 billion dollars, plus corporate debt, and blow up the whole world, cutting off the flow of its natural gas and oil, landslides quadrillion derivatives. They are not voiced any serious threats to Germany or the United States, despite the daily provocations in the form of constant barrage of partisan propaganda, comparing Putin (Putin) Hitler (Hitler), Saddam Hussein (Saddam Hussein), Muammar Gaddafi (Muammar Gaddafi) and other. They are preparing their offensive and defensive missile systems to war and mass accelerate their deployment. Russian patience - it's not their weakness is strength. The military situation in the west is getting worse every day, and Russia will soon be ready.
Russian military capabilities
Below - not a very useful overview of the Russian military capabilities, drawn up by the Council on Foreign Relations. Their strategic nuclear potential is compared with the US in terms of quantity, not quality. For example, the Russian intercontinental ballistic missile with multiple warheads independently targetable moves at a speed of about Mach 21 (16,000 miles per hour, range between Moscow and Washington - 4874 miles, or 18 minutes), which is much faster than the US, plus against it, in fact, no defense. We understand that they are already deploying its S-500, so it's an outdated review, according to informed sources, and the fact that the Chinese intend to deliver Russian S-400, implies that they should be left with something better. C-400 will make China invulnerable to US aircraft, as well as for ICBMs and cruise missiles.
Russian traditionally ignore and hide the fact that they have. Our sources suggest that their performance is much higher than that given in this review. When Russian tanks experts under the leadership of General Guderian (Guderian) visited the German tankostroitelnye enterprise, they kept asking Guderian, where larger tanks. Guderian was a very unpleasant sensation that Russian tanks were larger, they did not show. German panzer generals Paul Ludwig Ewald von Kleist (Paul Ludwig Ewald von Kleist) and Heinz Guderian (Heinz Guderian) were shocked in 1941, met in battle tank T-34, which was much better than the big German tank, and these generals described it as "the most deadly tank in the world." He has better firepower, mobility, protection and strength than any other tank. Its 76.2-mm (3-inch) gun with a high muzzle velocity of the charge was the best tank gun in the world; his heavy armor slope did not break the standard anti-tank weapons, and, moreover, he was very maneuverable. To stop this tank, the Germans had to direct him their anti-aircraft guns.
It is amazing to see such a Russian superiority, if you look at the GDP of France, Germany, England and the United States, but none of these countries do not have anything like that. Now we understand. Ultimately, not GDP wins the war, as found "Invincible Armada" off the coast of England.
In a sense, it is in comparison with the S-500 anti-missile missile "Patriot" looks like an old V-2 since World War II. Not discussed also antitank system "Cornet", which knocked out the tank "Merkava" IDF (Israel Defense Forces), is considered the most formidable tank in the world, and he was just as defenseless as a cavalry charge before machine-gun fire. In command of the IDF, I was told that because of the complex armored warfare obsolete. According to reliable sources, according to the Israeli AHI "Hanita" was impacted Russian rocket from Lebanon in July 2006 at a distance of 16 kilometers from the coast, who walked the most advanced US equipment interference, causing turmoil in the ranks of the Israel Defense Forces and the United States Army. The consequences were terrible. The only way to avoid impacts on surface ships, such as battleships and aircraft carriers, fifty rockets fired at the same time, such as the Russian SS-N-27 Sizzler, - this interference with their guidance mechanism, because otherwise it may be crushed and versatile combat system " Aegis ".
Russian rocket "Iskander" moves at a rate of 7 times the speed of sound, its range - 400 km, it can carry a 700 kg warhead of various kinds, and also has a range of error of up to 5 m. Because of this, it is a mortal threat to airports strategic points and other fixed infrastructure on a broad front conflict. "Iskander" may pose a threat to the objectives at the heart of Europe. All European way of war depends on achieving air superiority. Rommel (Rommel) said the same thing about the Normandy that aerial bombing shattered the most well-trained troops; in the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula air attack Field Marshal Wolfram Freiherr von Richthofen (Wolfram Freiherr von Richthofen) caused a loss of up to 50% of Soviet forces; and the 11th Army was still General Erich von Manstein (Erich von Manstein), despite the initial lack of strength, won a decisive victory, which earned him a field marshal's baton. NATO countries would have to face the need to disable these "Iskander", but then they would have to deal with missiles "ground-to-air" S-400, which can accommodate Russian in almost every theater of possible collisions. Accommodation S-400 in Kaliningrad could endanger NATO air operations deep into Europe. Break through the tiered display of missile systems S-400 NATO fighter is almost impossible, and given the astronomical cost of NATO fighters, the loss of one aircraft would state financial disaster. We could go on to the rocket launch, although the purpose of this review - not to carefully study this subject, and to convince the reader of the strategic weakness of the armed forces of the United States.
But that's not all. This review tells us nothing about the military capabilities of NATO. But below we find that it is so limited that Russia recognizes his complete ineffectiveness. President Kennedy (Kennedy) was paralyzed with fear of occurrence of even the threat of a nuclear attack in defense of Western Europe, and build up conventional forces, so he would not have to start a nuclear war to defend Europe. But now the situation is different. Do not discuss any capacity conventional army because lower Russian said they use their tactical nuclear weapons, etc., to defend against an attack using conventional weapons, so that the transfer of hundreds of thousands of soldiers in Normandy, is not discussed. And if you remember the C-400 and C-500, it is doubtful that these complexes broke through any ICBM or cruise missiles.
The Chinese have just signed with Russia significant contracts in the economic sphere on natural gas supply and sale of defensive missiles S-400, which together with the secret protocols, marks the creation of a new alliance, covering an enormous share of the Eurasian land area. The Chinese were not lazy and develop their own weapons, reflecting lasers from the satellites, inventing missiles that can shoot down satellites, quiet submarines that float near our aircraft carriers without detection, and their own anti-missiles that can shoot down a satellite reentry, moving faster, than any ICBMs. The opportunity to shoot down satellites allows you to temporarily demobilize whole arsenal of intercontinental ballistic missiles and force them to transfer management of the land. In the course of a nuclear exchange it could be a disaster. The pace of release of these submarines China and Russia is much higher than the US, and since we have demonstrated that the surface fleet is obsolete, because it is impossible to protect, in this case the United States are losing the arms race in the most important part of its naval fleet. Chinese and Russian submarines can encircle the western and eastern coast of the United States, and their nuclear cruise missiles could turn America into a nuclear target for competition shooting. Mobilization potential of the Chinese Army - 100 million men under arms. If you combine this with the Russian superiority in weapons, as well as their opportunity to call about 20 million people, the EU threatened stunning potential forces in the east. Bluff Zbigniew Bzhezinskogona Ukraine was exposed, and he made the biggest strategic blunder since we lost China in 1949. He wiped out the results of Richard Nixon (Richard Nixon), who pitched the Sino-Russian alliance - that's why Kissinger (Kissinger) called it folly "fatal." The recent agreement between China and Russia can be compared to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939.
And yet we see how the Baltic States and Poland, as well as other border states, as before World War II, raised the cry is not the case, rather than to improve relations with Russia, and expect us to unleash a nuclear war, which we easily can lose to protect 1.3 million citizens of Estonia, Britain and France went to war for the city of Danzig. Is not Poland in Munich, took part in the return of their former territory, inherited Czechoslovakia, Russia is trying to do with the Crimea and eastern regions, which were transferred to the Soviet Republic of Ukraine Leninymv 1919 (eastern part) and Hruschevymv 1954 (Crimea)? Who can justify a betrayal of the Treaty of Versailles? (The USSR or Russian had no intention to separate these areas from Russia, and these regions were arbitrarily defined as part of the Soviet Ukraine. Of course, East Prussia must also be returned to Germany and Eastern Poland - Poland to cancel the perfidy of Stalin after the war). Since when do we have to be responsible for Estonia, as some of the world policeman, and potentially save hundreds of millions of Americans in the country, of which more than 99% of Americans do not even know and who do not have strategic importance? And why do we have to pay for the defense of Europe, if it is greater than our GDP?
Since the current military doctrine of the United States does not rule out pre-emptive nuclear strikes, and Russian stated that they use tactical nuclear weapons to protect Russia from attack with conventional weapons, if not more, and they have 5,000 tactical nuclear weapons, it means that the so-called doctrine of mutual assured destruction, which kept the nuclear peace between the Soviet Union and the United States, is no longer valid. If we now see that the Russian have the advantage of strategic nuclear and defensive weapons, and the way it is, and they see that the GDP of the United States and the EU is ten times higher than the Russian, the window of opportunity to protect them may disappear in ten years, exposing them to a preemptive strike. We understand that the large-scale deployment of S-400 and S-500 is currently taking place, and, according to informed sources, it accelerated significantly in the past six months.
When will deploy several thousand such complexes, it will be enough to block a nuclear attack the United States, and then opens the possibility of a first strike for Russia. If we interpret the sanctions as an act of aggression, as did Japan, where we have applied sanctions to all oil supplies to the country July 25, 1941, and it was definitely an act of aggression, while Russian strategists may find themselves compelled to strike first, to preserve the existence of their country. If they delay, the Western countries can develop new weapons to protect themselves and be in position for a pre-emptive strike to protect themselves from Russia. War hysteria that we saw a few months ago in the United States, was to cause alarm in Russia. So expect that Russia will behave as quietly as possible over the next 6-12 months, as long as they deploy their missiles, and once this process is complete, then we can easily experience the greatest existential crisis in the history of the West.
source - >>>
We post the following letter from David K. Lifschultz, President of Genoil, Inc.whose offices are at One Rockefeller Center, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10020. David has been promoting his firm for many years; the company owns patents to a process which converts heavy oil into light oil at an economically advantageous cost.
We think his warnings are extremely serious and merit the consideration of our readers.
From David K. Lifschultz, January 11, 2105:
In view of the Gorbachev warning of nuclear war over the Ukraine, I resend again the analysis of Trotsky's «No Peace: No War» and a military review of Russia's capabilities.
Subject: "No War: No Peace" Commissar Leon Trotsky:
It is probably more accurate to describe the today's war of Germany against Russia as a The Hundreds Years' War starting in 1914, as Russia and Germany were allies in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871. These wars were interspersed as it has been by truces. The German plans at the 1914 commencement of The Hundreds Years' War were reflected during their Brest-Litovsk negotiations to annex Russian Poland, and the Ukraine was to be detached from Russia as an independent state under German protection. The Baltic States were to be annexed by Germany. The goals are exactly the same today in nature if not form.
It is important to note that the form of Empire or Imperialism changed in its form but not its nature after World War Two. In World War Two Roosevelt's war aims were to dismantle and take over five empires: that of Great Britain, France, the Netherlands, Germany and Japan. In other words, the United States inherited the control of the seas from Britain and their entire Empire as well as the others. This, or course, explains how our actions in French Indochina and our actions in British Iraq were no different than our predecessors. The use of the Cross against the Hammer and Sickle was just a ruse. The Korean and Vietnam Wars were part of the struggle against the Soviets where Stalin had large number of Russian aircraft and flyers directly participate in combat with the Americans in the Korean War. Empire was no longer called Empire but the incorporation into the free market system of the United States. Discipline is created by sanctions as in the case of Iran or war as in the case of Libya, Iraq, Syria, etc. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics completely replicated the geostrategic policies of the Tsars substituting Bolshevism for Christianity as their New Jerusalem and Stalin admired greatly Ivan The Terrible who is shown in Stalin's 1944 movie on Ivan IV of Russia always crushing Boyar rebellions as Tsar Stalin crushed continuous opposition from the Bolshevik Boyars.
It is traditional for the Russians to understate and conceal what they have.Our sources estimate they far exceed the estimates in this study. When the Russian tank experts toured under the guidance of Panzer General Guderian the German tank production facilities they kept asking Guderian where were their larger tanks. Guderian had a very uncomfortable feeling that the Russians had bigger ones that they were not showing. The German tank generals Paul Ludwig Ewald von Kleist and Heinz Guderian were shocked in 1941 to encounter the T-34, which was far larger than the largest German tank and these generals described it as «the deadliest tank in the world.» It possessed the best firepower, mobility, protection, and ruggedness of any tank. Its 76.2 3 inch high-velocity gun was the best tank gun in the world; its heavy sloped armor was impenetrable by standard anti-tank weapons, and furthermore it was very agile. The Germans had to aim their anti-aircraft guns at the tank to stop it.
It is astonishing to see such a Russian superiority when you look at the GDPs of France, Germany, England and the United States, but none had anything of the equivalent. We find this now. It is not GDP in the end that wins wars as the Spanish Armada found out off the shore of England.
In a sense, this is the S-500 which makes the Patriot anti-missile missile look like a dated V-2 of World War Two. Nor is there a discussion of the Kornet anti-tank missile that knocked out the Merkava Tank of the IDF which was regarded then as the most formidable tank in the world, and it was a defenseless as a cavalry charge into machine gun fire. The IDF commanders told me that it made tank warfare obsolete. The Israeli INS Hanit was according to reliable sources hit by a Russian missile fired from Lebanon in July of 2006 16 kilometers offshore which passed through the most sophisticated United States jamming equipment sending shock waves through the Israeli Defense Forces and the United States Military. The implications were dire. The only way surface ships such as battleships and aircraft carriers can avoid being hit by fifty missiles launched at one time such as the Russian SS-N-27 Sizzler is by jamming their targeting mechanism for otherwise the Aegis Combat System of the Navy could be overwhelmed .
The Russian Iskander missile travels 7 times the speed of sound which has a range of 400 km, can carry a 700 kg warhead of several varieties, and has a circular error probability of around five meters. This makes it deadly to airfields, logistics points and other stationary infrastructure along a broad front of conflict. The Iskander can threaten targets deep in Europe. The entire western way of war depends on the achievement of air supremacy. Rommel says as much at Normandy that the aerial bombing smashed the best trained troops and at the battle of the Kerch Peninsula Field Marshall Wolfram Freiherr von Richthofen's air attacks inflicted casualties of up to 50% on the Soviet force, and though initially outnumbered, the then general Erich von Manstein's Eleventh Army won a decisive victory that earned him the Field Marshall's baton. It would be a necessity for NATO to knock out these Iskanders but they would have to face the S-400 surface to air missile which the Russians can layer in defense zones in nearly every conceivable theater of conflict. Positioning the S-400 at Kaliningrad could endanger NATO air operations deep in Europe. It would be nearly impossible for the NATO fighters to penetrate this layered screen of S-400s, and based on the astronomical cost of the NATO fighters, the loss of a single aircraft very nearly would represent a national fiscal catastrophe. We could go on and on from weapon to weapon, though the purpose of this review is not to exhaustively examine the subject but to drive the point home about the strategic weakness of the United States forces.
But this is not all. This study does not tell us anything of NATO capabilities. But we have below that they are so limited that Russia admits that they are not effective at all. President Kennedy was transfixed in fear of having to have only a threat of a nuclear attack to defend western Europe, and built up the conventional capacity so that he did not have to launch a nuclear war to defend Europe. But that is not the situation now. There even can not be any question of a buildup of conventional capacity as the Russians have said below that they would use their tactical nuclear weapons and more to defend themselves against a conventional attack so that sending a hundreds of thousands of troops as at Normandy as is out of the question. And based on the S-400 and S-500, it is questionable if any of our ICBM or cruise missiles can get through.
The Chinese who have just completed significant economic treaties with Russia on natural gas deliveries and the sale of S-400 defensive missiles, and combined with secret protocols, creates a new alliance combining a huge portion of the Eurasian land mass. The Chinese have not been slack in their own weapons development bouncing lasers off satellites, developing missiles that can hit the satellites, silent submarines that surface beside our aircraft carriers without detection, and their own anti-missile missile that can hit a reentering satellite moving faster than any ICBM. The ability to knock out satellites would temporarily demobilize the entire ICBM arsenal and force its conversion to land control of the missile's guidance. In the midst of a nuclear exchange, this could be disastrous. The pace of the rollout of these submarines by China and Russia far exceeds that of the United States, and since we have demonstrated that the surface fleet is obsolete as it can not be defended, then the United States is losing the arms race in the most vital part of their Navy. The Chinese and Russian submarines can surround the west and east coasts of the United States, and their nuclear cruise missiles can turn the United States into a nuclear turkey shoot. The mobilization capacity of the Chinese Army is 100 million men under arms. If you combine that with the Russian superiority in weapons, and their ability to field probably 20 million men, the EU faces overwhelming potential forces to their east. The Zbigniew Brzezinski bluff in the Ukraine has been called, and he has created the greatest strategic blunder since we lost China in 1949. He has undid the work of Richard Nixon when he broke apart the China-Russian alliance which is why Kissinger has referred to this madness as «fatal». The recent treaties between China and Russia can be compared to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939.
And yet we see the Baltic states and Poland and other border states as before World War Two screaming bloody murder instead of trying to get along with Russia and expecting us to launch a nuclear war that we may very well lose to defend 1.3 million people in Estonia as Britain and France went to war over the city of Danzig. And was it not Poland who at Munich participated in the retrieving their former territory from Czechoslovakia as Russia is trying to do in the Crimea and Eastern Provinces that were given to the Soviet Republic of the Ukraine by Lenin in 1919 (Eastern Provinces) and Khrushchev in 1954 (Crimea)? Who can defend the treachery of the Versailles Treaty? (It was not the Soviet or Russian intention to ever see these separated from Russia and was granted conditional on these areas being part of the Ukrainian Russia. Certainly Eastern Prussia should be also returned to Germany and Eastern Poland to Poland to undo Stalin's treachery after the war.) Since when should we be responsible for Estonia as some sort of world policeman and lose potentially hundreds of millions of Americans over countries that 99% of the American people do not even know anything about and have no strategic significance. And why should we be paying for the defense of Europe at all when their GDP is larger than ours.
Since present United States military doctrine does not preclude preemptive strikes of nuclear weapons, and the Russians have said that they will use tactical nuclear weapons to defend Russia against a conventional attack if not more, and they have 5,000 tactical nuclear weapons to hardly any for ourselves , it means that the so-called MAD doctrine that kept the nuclear peace between the Soviet Union and the United States no longer governs. If we see now that the Russians have the superiority in strategic nuclear and defensive weapons, and they do, and they see the GDP of the United States and the EU being ten times theirs, the window of opportunity to defend themselves could disappear in ten years subjecting them to a preemptive attack. We understand that a massive deployment of the S-400 and S-500 is taking place at the present time, and it has dramatically accelerated in the last six months according to informed sources.
Once many thousands of them are deployed sufficient to block a nuclear attack by the United States, the window of opportunity of a first strike for Russia will then exist. If we interpret sanctions as an act of war as Japan did when we sanctioned all deliveries of oil to them on July 25, 1941, and it certainly was an act of war, then the Russian planners may consider themselves forced to launch a first strike to preserve the existence of their nation. If they wait, the west may develop new weapons to defend themselves, and be in a position to launch the preemptive strike themselves against Russia. The war hysteria we saw a few months ago in the United States must have set off alarm bells in Russia. Therefore, we should expect Russia to be as quiet as possible for the next six to twelve months while they deploy their missiles, and once they are in place, then we may well enter into the greatest existential crisis in the history of the west.
source - >>>
No comments:
Post a Comment