Obama Administration: manifest bias against Sunnis and cooperation with the Shiites?
Hussain Abdul-Hussain | Tuesday, 01/27/2015
Share the article:
Brzezinski in the hearing session of Congress: I do not understand why we're so careful to overthrow Assad? (AFP)
In the midst of the successive events, were cut US Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Intelligence remarks, Michael Vickers, last week, a lot
of attention, but it showed a bias beyond doubt President Barack Obama
and his administration, in the interests of the Shiite identity
organizations, Iran, at the expense of Sunni groups and systems.
At the meeting hosted by the "Atlantic Center" Research in the US capital, in response to a question about whether his country's "intelligence coordinate lines" with the Houthi group in Yemen, vicar replied in the affirmative. A few days later, Washington announced it would cut coordination in the fight against terrorism, which has been doing with the Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, the government in the face of "al-Qaeda".
Previously, Obama pointed out that in the past, repeatedly, to what he saw as the success of his government's cooperation with the Yemeni government model in the face of terrorism, any "al-Qaeda" exclusively without the Houthis. But with the collapse of the Yemeni government, an ally of Washington, in front of the Houthis, the Obama administration did not see the need to build an international coalition or the use of fighter jets to the legitimate interests of the Yemeni government, as did the United States in defense of the Iraqi government in the face of the "Islamic state". But that Washington cut ties Yemeni legitimate government collapsed, at a time when Vickers confirmed that US intelligence ongoing relationship with the Houthis, mostly to meet the "al-Qaeda" in Yemen. It does not appear that the Houthis argument slogans of "Death to America and Israel and the Jews" disturb Obama or his team.
The Obama bias in favor of Iran and their groups in Yemen at the same time when Washington revealed her secret about the Syrian issue, as Foreign Minister John Kerry announced his country's support for "the Moscow conference" dedicated to the Syrian crisis, which observers agree that it will take place for the benefit of rehabilitation Assad against the Syrian opposition interest of the National Coalition for the forces of the revolution and the Syrian opposition.
After Kerry reared newspaper "New York Times", in an editorial, last Sunday, the US government calls for consideration Daash imminent danger in Syria, and the need to adopt a practical policy to the survival of the lion, instead of the loose things in the event of his death. And "New York Times" is one of the earliest newspapers to the US administration, the more likely that the editorial mentioned was inspired by lobbies spent by the United Arab Emirates government a lot of money. The lobbies themselves have arranged for the magazine "Foreign Affairs," an interview with al-Assad, on Monday, which lobbies itself, which believes that the global and US and Arab circumstances entirely appropriate to launch a public relations campaign to rehabilitate the image of the lion in order to keep him in power in Damascus.
Of course, "New York Times" has not seen a non-governmental extremist forces in Syria, but in Daash Sunni armed groups, while it does not seem that the pro-Iranian groups and Assad worry prestigious American newspaper, which confirms the idea that Obama became biased entirely in the interests of Iran and Shiite groups against opponents of Iran and groups Sunni extremist was the mother of a moderate.
American bias against Sunnis in Yemen and Syria also repeated in Iraq, where he promised to America's Sunni tribes to establish a "national guard" independent of its fighters, to go back on its promise and insists that engage Sunni insurgents in the ranks of the government of the Iraqi army, while it does not seem that the United States reluctant Activity Shiite militias Iraqi non-governmental organizations, of all types, known as the popular crowd and the commander of the "Qods Force" in the "Iranian Revolutionary Guards" Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
This is Washington, Obama, minister is foreign John Kerry, a friendly relationship and direct contact via e-mail with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif, images frequent bilateral meetings between the two are many, with hardly rare that we find friendship Kerry rally and his counterparts in any of the Sunni majority in the Middle District Governments East, Turkey and Qatar to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Why Obama is biased Shiites against Sunnis? Initial responses may refer to "lethal pragmatic" and "practical and realistic" pay US president to reduce US intervention, and dealing with the status quo, and the endorsement of the stronger party. But some observers in Washington may point to the reasons has to realism and political savvy something.
Insiders say that the closest associates of the president believe, probably convinced him that Iran is an ancient empire with a long history, and that the alliance with the most effective of the alliance with the rest of the region swing in their views and positions. Among those closest adviser to the president, Valerie Jarrett, and enjoys friendship with him and the First Lady for decades. And Jarrett are born in the southern Iranian city of Shiraz, where she spent the first years there are eight years old, where her father was a doctor in the US Mptosa Iran.
Besides Jarrett, peered last week Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser under former Democratic President Jimmy Carter, in a congressional hearing to say that "Iran began to develop into a civilized and very important country in history." Brzezinski said that he shared this view with Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser under the administrations of former Republican presidents are Gerald Ford and George HW Bush.
And Brzezinski is an American national security adviser, which occurred during his time in the White House, the Iranian Revolution in 1979, which was tasked by President Carter to proceed openness to the Khomeini regime, He met the US official in charge of a senior Iranian, is Mehdi Bazargan in Algeria, but the acceleration of events Khomeini was forced to cut the road to the Communists Baiezh for supporters to invade the US Embassy in Tehran and the detention of US diplomats hostage, or at least this is shown by Carter notes and responsibility.
It said Brzezinski, a supporter of Iran as a "civilization of important state" in the hearing: "I do not understand why we are so careful to overthrow Assad? Is Assad enemy? Is Assad is worse than the other regimes in the region?".
Obama officials, current and former siding today clearly to Iran and the Shiites against Sunnis and their systems and their organizations, including moderate and extremist. This bias was in dark cellars and became today on the pages of newspapers and tongues officials
At the meeting hosted by the "Atlantic Center" Research in the US capital, in response to a question about whether his country's "intelligence coordinate lines" with the Houthi group in Yemen, vicar replied in the affirmative. A few days later, Washington announced it would cut coordination in the fight against terrorism, which has been doing with the Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, the government in the face of "al-Qaeda".
Previously, Obama pointed out that in the past, repeatedly, to what he saw as the success of his government's cooperation with the Yemeni government model in the face of terrorism, any "al-Qaeda" exclusively without the Houthis. But with the collapse of the Yemeni government, an ally of Washington, in front of the Houthis, the Obama administration did not see the need to build an international coalition or the use of fighter jets to the legitimate interests of the Yemeni government, as did the United States in defense of the Iraqi government in the face of the "Islamic state". But that Washington cut ties Yemeni legitimate government collapsed, at a time when Vickers confirmed that US intelligence ongoing relationship with the Houthis, mostly to meet the "al-Qaeda" in Yemen. It does not appear that the Houthis argument slogans of "Death to America and Israel and the Jews" disturb Obama or his team.
The Obama bias in favor of Iran and their groups in Yemen at the same time when Washington revealed her secret about the Syrian issue, as Foreign Minister John Kerry announced his country's support for "the Moscow conference" dedicated to the Syrian crisis, which observers agree that it will take place for the benefit of rehabilitation Assad against the Syrian opposition interest of the National Coalition for the forces of the revolution and the Syrian opposition.
After Kerry reared newspaper "New York Times", in an editorial, last Sunday, the US government calls for consideration Daash imminent danger in Syria, and the need to adopt a practical policy to the survival of the lion, instead of the loose things in the event of his death. And "New York Times" is one of the earliest newspapers to the US administration, the more likely that the editorial mentioned was inspired by lobbies spent by the United Arab Emirates government a lot of money. The lobbies themselves have arranged for the magazine "Foreign Affairs," an interview with al-Assad, on Monday, which lobbies itself, which believes that the global and US and Arab circumstances entirely appropriate to launch a public relations campaign to rehabilitate the image of the lion in order to keep him in power in Damascus.
Of course, "New York Times" has not seen a non-governmental extremist forces in Syria, but in Daash Sunni armed groups, while it does not seem that the pro-Iranian groups and Assad worry prestigious American newspaper, which confirms the idea that Obama became biased entirely in the interests of Iran and Shiite groups against opponents of Iran and groups Sunni extremist was the mother of a moderate.
American bias against Sunnis in Yemen and Syria also repeated in Iraq, where he promised to America's Sunni tribes to establish a "national guard" independent of its fighters, to go back on its promise and insists that engage Sunni insurgents in the ranks of the government of the Iraqi army, while it does not seem that the United States reluctant Activity Shiite militias Iraqi non-governmental organizations, of all types, known as the popular crowd and the commander of the "Qods Force" in the "Iranian Revolutionary Guards" Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
This is Washington, Obama, minister is foreign John Kerry, a friendly relationship and direct contact via e-mail with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif, images frequent bilateral meetings between the two are many, with hardly rare that we find friendship Kerry rally and his counterparts in any of the Sunni majority in the Middle District Governments East, Turkey and Qatar to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Why Obama is biased Shiites against Sunnis? Initial responses may refer to "lethal pragmatic" and "practical and realistic" pay US president to reduce US intervention, and dealing with the status quo, and the endorsement of the stronger party. But some observers in Washington may point to the reasons has to realism and political savvy something.
Insiders say that the closest associates of the president believe, probably convinced him that Iran is an ancient empire with a long history, and that the alliance with the most effective of the alliance with the rest of the region swing in their views and positions. Among those closest adviser to the president, Valerie Jarrett, and enjoys friendship with him and the First Lady for decades. And Jarrett are born in the southern Iranian city of Shiraz, where she spent the first years there are eight years old, where her father was a doctor in the US Mptosa Iran.
Besides Jarrett, peered last week Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser under former Democratic President Jimmy Carter, in a congressional hearing to say that "Iran began to develop into a civilized and very important country in history." Brzezinski said that he shared this view with Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser under the administrations of former Republican presidents are Gerald Ford and George HW Bush.
And Brzezinski is an American national security adviser, which occurred during his time in the White House, the Iranian Revolution in 1979, which was tasked by President Carter to proceed openness to the Khomeini regime, He met the US official in charge of a senior Iranian, is Mehdi Bazargan in Algeria, but the acceleration of events Khomeini was forced to cut the road to the Communists Baiezh for supporters to invade the US Embassy in Tehran and the detention of US diplomats hostage, or at least this is shown by Carter notes and responsibility.
It said Brzezinski, a supporter of Iran as a "civilization of important state" in the hearing: "I do not understand why we are so careful to overthrow Assad? Is Assad enemy? Is Assad is worse than the other regimes in the region?".
Obama officials, current and former siding today clearly to Iran and the Shiites against Sunnis and their systems and their organizations, including moderate and extremist. This bias was in dark cellars and became today on the pages of newspapers and tongues officials
Obama Administration: manifest bias against Sunnis and cooperation with the Shiites?
Hussain Abdul-Hussain | Tuesday, 01/27/2015 Brzezinski in the hearing session of Congress: I do not understand why we're so careful to overthrow Assad? (AFP)
In the midst of the successive events, were cut US Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Intelligence remarks, Michael Vickers, last week, a lot
of attention, but it showed a bias beyond doubt President Barack Obama
and his administration, in the interests of the Shiite identity
organizations, Iran, at the expense of Sunni groups and systems.
At the meeting hosted by the "Atlantic Center" Research in the US capital, in response to a question about whether his country's "intelligence coordinate lines" with the Houthi group in Yemen, vicar replied in the affirmative. A few days later, Washington announced it would cut coordination in the fight against terrorism, which has been doing with the Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, the government in the face of "al-Qaeda".
At the meeting hosted by the "Atlantic Center" Research in the US capital, in response to a question about whether his country's "intelligence coordinate lines" with the Houthi group in Yemen, vicar replied in the affirmative. A few days later, Washington announced it would cut coordination in the fight against terrorism, which has been doing with the Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, the government in the face of "al-Qaeda".
Previously, Obama pointed out that in the past, repeatedly, to what he saw as the success of his government's cooperation with the Yemeni government model in the face of terrorism, any "al-Qaeda" exclusively without the Houthis. But with the collapse of the Yemeni government, an ally of Washington, in front of the Houthis, the Obama administration did not see the need to build an international coalition or the use of fighter jets to the legitimate interests of the Yemeni government, as did the United States in defense of the Iraqi government in the face of the "Islamic state". But that Washington cut ties Yemeni legitimate government collapsed, at a time when Vickers confirmed that US intelligence ongoing relationship with the Houthis, mostly to meet the "al-Qaeda" in Yemen. It does not appear that the Houthis argument slogans of "Death to America and Israel and the Jews" disturb Obama or his team.
The Obama bias in favor of Iran and their groups in Yemen at the same time when Washington revealed her secret about the Syrian issue, as Foreign Minister John Kerry announced his country's support for "the Moscow conference" dedicated to the Syrian crisis, which observers agree that it will take place for the benefit of rehabilitation Assad against the Syrian opposition interest of the National Coalition for the forces of the revolution and the Syrian opposition.
After Kerry reared newspaper "New York Times", in an editorial, last Sunday, the US government calls for consideration Daash imminent danger in Syria, and the need to adopt a practical policy to the survival of the lion, instead of the loose things in the event of his death. And "New York Times" is one of the earliest newspapers to the US administration, the more likely that the editorial mentioned was inspired by lobbies spent by the United Arab Emirates government a lot of money. The lobbies themselves have arranged for the magazine "Foreign Affairs," an interview with al-Assad, on Monday, which lobbies itself, which believes that the global and US and Arab circumstances entirely appropriate to launch a public relations campaign to rehabilitate the image of the lion in order to keep him in power in Damascus.
Of course, "New York Times" has not seen a non-governmental extremist forces in Syria, but in Daash Sunni armed groups, while it does not seem that the pro-Iranian groups and Assad worry prestigious American newspaper, which confirms the idea that Obama became biased entirely in the interests of Iran and Shiite groups against opponents of Iran and groups Sunni extremist was the mother of a moderate.
American bias against Sunnis in Yemen and Syria also repeated in Iraq, where he promised to America's Sunni tribes to establish a "national guard" independent of its fighters, to go back on its promise and insists that engage Sunni insurgents in the ranks of the government of the Iraqi army, while it does not seem that the United States reluctant Activity Shiite militias Iraqi non-governmental organizations, of all types, known as the popular crowd and the commander of the "Qods Force" in the "Iranian Revolutionary Guards" Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
This is Washington, Obama, minister is foreign John Kerry, a friendly relationship and direct contact via e-mail with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif, images frequent bilateral meetings between the two are many, with hardly rare that we find friendship Kerry rally and his counterparts in any of the Sunni majority in the Middle District Governments East, Turkey and Qatar to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Why Obama is biased Shiites against Sunnis? Initial responses may refer to "lethal pragmatic" and "practical and realistic" pay US president to reduce US intervention, and dealing with the status quo, and the endorsement of the stronger party. But some observers in Washington may point to the reasons has to realism and political savvy something.
Insiders say that the closest associates of the president believe, probably convinced him that Iran is an ancient empire with a long history, and that the alliance with the most effective of the alliance with the rest of the region swing in their views and positions. Among those closest adviser to the president, Valerie Jarrett, and enjoys friendship with him and the First Lady for decades. And Jarrett are born in the southern Iranian city of Shiraz, where she spent the first years there are eight years old, where her father was a doctor in the US Mptosa Iran.
Besides Jarrett, peered last week Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser under former Democratic President Jimmy Carter, in a congressional hearing to say that "Iran began to develop into a civilized and very important country in history." Brzezinski said that he shared this view with Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser under the administrations of former Republican presidents are Gerald Ford and George HW Bush.
And Brzezinski is an American national security adviser, which occurred during his time in the White House, the Iranian Revolution in 1979, which was tasked by President Carter to proceed openness to the Khomeini regime, He met the US official in charge of a senior Iranian, is Mehdi Bazargan in Algeria, but the acceleration of events Khomeini was forced to cut the road to the Communists Baiezh for supporters to invade the US Embassy in Tehran and the detention of US diplomats hostage, or at least this is shown by Carter notes and responsibility.
It said Brzezinski, a supporter of Iran as a "civilization of important state" in the hearing: "I do not understand why we are so careful to overthrow Assad? Is Assad enemy? Is Assad is worse than the other regimes in the region?".
Obama officials, current and former siding today clearly to Iran and the Shiites against Sunnis and their systems and their organizations, including moderate and extremist. This bias was in dark cellars and became today on the pages of newspapers and tongues officials
No comments:
Post a Comment