Obama exceeds Chamberlain by switching allegiance from ally to enemy

Obama exceeds Chamberlain by switching allegiance from ally to enemy

By A. Dru Kristenev  March 2, 2015
Comments| Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us | There is no comparison between supporting the survival of a nation and defending another nation’s violent intent. One is struggling for its very life, surrounded by enemies on virtually every side. The other is a theocratic foe to western countries, expending every resource on developing methods to destroy the West.
In this scenario, why does the Leader of the Free World side with the menace rather than the underdog? We are watching the unraveling of order in the world as the Obama administration turns its back on a tried ally in favor of treating with a duplicitous regime bent on destroying the West.
President Obama and his blinded courtiers have stepped far beyond the appeasement strategies of Neville Chamberlain by issuing threats against tested friends.
No word defines this better than betrayal; betrayal of Israel, Europe and his own constituents, we citizens who elected him to stand for us not against us.
As reported by FoxNews, “…Obama is willing to leave some nuclear activity intact, backed by safeguards that Iran is not trying to develop a weapon. Iran insists its program is solely for peaceful energy and medical research.”
The Third Reich made virtually the same promise when signing the accord that awarded it the Sudetenland, that it would desist hostilities and be content with the slice of Czechoslovakia. Ignoring the agreement, it went forward to gobble up the rest of the nation and invade Poland then the USSR. Iran has no intention of discontinuing its march toward gaining nuclear weapons, which are specific for its stated purpose of sanitizing the earth of the Israeli virus, the “Little Satan,” only to be followed by the “Big” one: America.
As much as U.N. Ambassador Samantha Powers reiterates Obama’s commitment to our ally, “There will never be a sunset on America’s commitment to Israel’s security,” the actions of the State Department, led by John Kerry, disavows the assertion.
March 3, 2015, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses Congress, and despite having no knowledge of the speech’s contents, the administration has been busy fomenting distrust and division between the two nations. The fact that the president would issue a threat to fire upon any Israeli jet flying a mission to safeguard its people demonstrates the faithlessness of the White House. It should also send shivers down the spines of other nations who have believed themselves to be ranked as allies.
To any elected official, never should personal peeves, politics or preferences influence the greater good of one’s nation. Recognizing that statesmanship was replaced by political expedience long ago, it should come as no surprise that the occupants of the Oval Office, Cabinet positions and even Congressional seats are willing to sacrifice their constituents for what are, in the end, meaningless power plays if the world around them crumbles as a result.
Disqus Comments

Former newspaper publisher, A. Dru Kristenev, has four decades of experience in periodicals. Kristenev grew up in the publishing industry working every angle of a paper, from ad composition and sales, to personnel management, copy writing, and overseeing all editorial content. During her tenure as a news professional, Kristenev traveled internationally as both a representative of the paper and non-profit organizations.
Kristenev carries a Master’s Degree and taught at some of the foremost colleges of the Inland Northwest until going on the road with fulltime ministry and writing in 2010.
Since 2007, Kristenev has authored four fact-filled political suspense novels, the Baron Series, and two non-fiction books, all available on Amazon.
changingwind.org